Predicting critical transitions from time series synchrophasor data

Published in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2012

Recommended citation: Cotilla-Sanchez E, Hines P, Danforth CM. "Predicting critical transitions from time series synchrophasor data." IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. 3(4):1832-1840 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2012.2213848

The dynamical behavior of power systems under stress frequently deviates from the predictions of deterministic models. Model-free methods for detecting signs of excessive stress before instability occurs would therefore be valuable. The mathematical frameworks of “fast-slow systems” and “critical slowing down” can describe the statistical behavior of dynamical systems that are subjected to random perturbations as they approach points of instability. This paper builds from existing literature on fast-slow systems to provide evidence that time series data alone can be useful to estimate the temporal distance of a power system to a critical transition, such as voltage collapse. Our method is based on identifying evidence of critical slowing down in a single stream of synchronized phasor measurements. Results from a single machine, stochastic infinite bus model, a three machine/nine bus system and the Western North American disturbance of 10 August 1996 illustrate the utility of the proposed method.

Erratum: After fruitful discussions with Martin Hessler at University of Munster (and his reconstruction of missing metadata from BPA printed sources), it appears that the most plausible explanation for the WECC frequency signal corresponds to a different timescale (of system restoration). The changes in criticality (decreasing, with the correct timescale) would correspond to system reconnections, particularly around large hydro gens, and added inertia. This does not alter the analysis on the other two synthetic experiments or the fundamental discussion in this work. A more detailed discussion regarding what specific signals are more likely to show criticality symptoms in power systems was described in our 2014 paper. For a broader discussion, namely, how to discern between N-tipping and B-tipping event indicators, I highly recommend Martin’s latest paper preprint and upcoming joint work in this topic. -ECS

Download paper here